Diese Seite auf Deutsch | Legal notice | About GMO Safety

Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)GMO Safety : Genetic engeneering - Environment - Plants

Sifo project: Effects of Bt maize on butterflies and their antagonists

Maize and its scents



It is the end of August 2003. A maize field withered by the relentless summer heat – only a few plants have any green remaining on their leaves. "So long as the plants are still a little bit green, there is a chance that they may release scents." Christine Zipfel from the Max Planck Institute in Jena is optimistic, but today will be the last time this year that she and her colleagues will collect the maize scent.

You can hear where the plants are that are having their scent collected. This is because the scent is collected using contraptions powered by car batteries, which produce a regular humming sound. The principle is simple: the maize plant is covered with a plastic bag, into which a pump pumps six litres of air per minute from the environment through an activated carbon filter. At the top, the same air is sucked out again by a second pump. The ‘trap’ is placed in front of this second pump. The scents given off by the plant have to pass through a plastic tube and are captured by a white powder called ‘Super Q’. This powder is capable of binding the volatile substances. Later, in the laboratory, these substances can then be washed out again. The scents can be identified using a special analysis device which separates the individual molecules according to their size and charge. With this method it is possible to accurately record and compare the scent patterns of individual plants.


‘Tritrophic interaction’ between plant, caterpillar and parasitoid: The caterpillar eats the plant, the plant releases scents which attract parasitoids, e.g. parasitic wasps, which parasitize the caterpillar.

Field measurements are taken at two trial sites. Three pairs of varieties (transgenic variety with its non-GM parent variety) are tested in plots arranged according to a particular experiment design.

 


Art of packing in the maize field: Air is passed through a plastic bag and the scents carried along in the air stream are collected.


A pump sucks the air out of the top of the plastic bag again. The scents are collected in a special powder.


At the start of measuring, Christine Zipfel tested whether the plants are subjected to stress as a result of the measuring process – stress that might affect the release of scents. After all, they are covered with a bag in which the temperature heats up and the air humidity increases. To carry out the test, the scent spectrum of the young field plants was compared with that of laboratory plants with no caterpillar infestation. They were the same.


Comparison of release of primary scents among the transgenic variety Valmont (Bt 176) when eaten by various caterpillars.
The fact that the European corn borer triggers such a small release of scent is primarily due to the fact that the Bt toxin effectively prevents the plant being eaten by corn borers.


Comparison of release of primary scents for variety pair Navares (transgenic Bt 176) and Antares (isogenic) when infested by the Egyptian cotton leafworm (spodoptera littoralis)


An adapted Tupperware pot with wire netting openings, masked to keep birds out, but big enough for small insects. These ‘cages’ were primed with larvae of the Egyptian cotton leafworm (spodoptora littoralis) and leaf material from the various maize varieties and attached to the top third of a plant. These cage experiments were designed to determine the parasitisation rates in Bt maize and the control varieties. To check whether the larvae had been parasitized, they were left to grow for three weeks in the laboratory. However, no cases of parasitisation were found.

Indirect defence

Christine Zipfel and her colleagues want to discover whether the release of scents in Bt maize is different from conventional maize. The scientists are particularly interested in these substances because scent is a means of communication for the plant. For instance, when a maize plant starts to be eaten by a caterpillar it releases volatile substances which attract the antagonists of the caterpillar. If it is lucky, a parasitic wasp will respond to the signal and parasitize the caterpillar by laying eggs in it. This interplay between plant, butterfly and parasitoid could be affected by a change in the release of signal substances in Bt maize.

Scent production is triggered by a substance in the pest’s saliva. Each pest provokes a different scent composition.

“The part of the plant attacked by the caterpillar is also significant”. Christine Zipfel points to the stem of a maize plant: "The European corn borer for instance eats this part and triggers fewer scent emissions than other caterpillars, which tend to eat the leaves."

There are three main scents that are triggered when caterpillars eat the maize plant: caryophyllene, bergamotene and farnesene. To what extent is the formation of these substances triggered by various caterpillars and in what composition? Much fundamental research is still necessary before this question can be answered. Within this project, various caterpillars are tested in a climate chamber, in which the temperature, air humidity, light and other environmental factors can be controlled. They are placed on maize plants and the emitted scents are then collected and analysed.

Individual scents

Each maize variety has its own particular maize-typical basic scent pattern and each plant has its own variant of this pattern, which it acquires over the course of its life and which is constantly subject to change. A young maize plant does not emit scents. It starts developing scent patterns only in the intensive growth phase, depending on the type of location and to what extent it is attacked by pests and pathogens. A plant’s recent life experiences can therefore be identified from its scent.

Not much happens with old plants. The scent pattern is no longer altered if the plant is attacked by caterpillars because the leaves are too tough to be eaten or because there is more attractive fodder in the vicinity.

Scent emissions change over the course of the day as well. Plants emit the largest amount of scent at midday and in the early afternoon. This is why the team always carries out three hours of measurements around lunchtime. During the heat wave however, measurements had to be limited to one hour because otherwise the pumps overheated.

Measurements were carried out on this field once in July and once in August. Two average-looking plants were selected at random for measurement from each of the eight plots of the trial field. When selecting plants for today’s measurement, however, it is just a question of finding two plants with a bit of green on them. At this stage Christine Zipfel is happy to get at least one good, analysable measurement per plot.

A whole range of influencing factors

In the field there is, of course, an abundance of influencing factors that can affect a measurement result and are difficult to assess. For instance, although the composition of scents among plants of the same variety is generally the same – at least as regards the primary components – there can be considerable differences in the amount of scent released. Plants that look very similar, have a similar weight and are infested with roughly the same number of caterpillars can still emit very different amounts of scent. Maybe because their basic constitution is different, or maybe the scent balance is affected by fungal infection, root pests or other factors.

For this reason, preliminary tests were carried out in the laboratory to determine the scent patterns of the different pairs of varieties in the absence of site and infestation influences, and so that they could later be compared with the field data. In addition to the field measurements, molecular tests are also being conducted. Leaf samples are taken from the individual varieties on the different plots and examined to see whether certain genes responsible for individual scent components are disabled.

Preliminary results

So far, the measurements in the laboratory and in the field have not shown any verifiable Bt effect. Differences were found in one variety pair – between the transgenic variety Novelis (Mon 810) and its isogenic parent variety Nobilis – both in terms of the scent spectrum and the amount of scent emitted. However, Christine Zipfel sees this as a varietal effect, i.e. due to the fact that these two varieties differ in more aspects than just the genetic modification.

This year, and last year too, the scent composition suddenly changed in late July/early August from one measurement to the next for all transgenic and isogenic varieties under investigation. Whether and to what extent this may have been caused by the extreme weather conditions (the flooding last year, heat wave this year) remains a mystery for the moment.

 

 

gmoSafety: More on this topic

 

Site Search

Full text search of all online content
personal memo
0document is at present noted on your personal memo.
Change font size
123
On the brink

[jump to top]