Diese Seite auf Deutsch | Legal notice | About GMO Safety

Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)GMO Safety : Genetic engeneering - Environment - Plants

Genetic engineering: Insect resistance

Bacterial arsenal to combat chewing insects


Plants are producing their own insecticide and using it to ward off their attackers. Genetic engineering has fundamentally changed the face of plant protection. Maize and cotton with genetically engineered insect resistance have been extensively cultivated for about ten years now, particularly in the USA. And these sorts of maize varieties are already approved in the European Union as well.


Made possible by genetic engineering: The active ingredient used to combat the voracious European corn borer caterpillars actually comes from a bacterium. It is now produced in the maize plants. In early genetically modified varieties it was produced in all plant parts. More recent varieties produce the active ingredients predominantly where it is needed: in the stem. This is where the caterpillars live, beyond the reach of conventional pesticides.


Bt crops: levels of use


Bt maize: cultivation in the USA (in million ha) Some transgenic maize varieties have herbicide resistance as well as Bt resistance to the European corn borer ("stacked genes"). In 2007 73% of maize cultivation in the USA consisted of GM maize.

Other countries in which Bt maize is grown commercially: Canada, Argentina, South Africa and Spain.

Germany: trial cultivation on around 500 hectares per year since 1998. In 2006 Bt maize was grown commercially for the first time. In 2007 Bt maize was grown on 950 hectares. Crop-growing sites with a total area of around 4500 hectares have been registered for 2008.


Bt cotton: cultivation in the USA (in million ha) Some transgenic cotton varieties have herbicide resistance as well as Bt resistance ("stacked genes"). GM cotton accounted for around 83% of cotton cultivation in the USA in 2006.

Other countries in which Bt cotton is grown commercially: Australia, Argentina, China, India, Mexico, South Africa and Indonesia.

Bt toxins in plant breeding: Work is currently being conducted on around 30 different plant species to confer resistance to various chewing insects by transferring Bt genes.

EU authorisations: In the case of Bt maize, two "events" have been approved for cultivation in the European Union:MON 810 and T 25.Further applications are still awaiting a decision. All varieties grown in the EU are based on MON810.

It has been known since the start of the last century that a commonly occurring soil bacterium - Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) - has a lethal toxic effect on certain insects. This is due to a protein produced by the bacteria, known as Bt toxin.

With the Bt toxin, as with all proteins, the "blueprint" is encoded in a specific DNA sequence (gene). The gene is expressed and the respective protein produced. This process is basically the same in both bacterial cells and plants. If the Bt toxin gene isolated from bacteria is inserted into a plant’s genetic material, the plant cells will obey the "command" of the foreign gene: the plant then produces its own Bt toxin. Chewing insects sensitive to the toxin strain in question absorb the active ingredient, which is specifically toxic to them, along with the plant parts. If the concept works, insecticides will no longer be needed to control these pests.

Maize: the most important Bt plant

Reports of Bt genes being integrated into plants started emerging as far back as the 1980s, initially with tobacco and tomatoes. Then in 1995 the US authorised the first Bt plant: Bt maize.

The Bt concept was particularly attractive for maize, since it made it possible for the first time to combat the European corn borer caterpillars inside the plant. Bt maize has now been grown on a large scale for over a decade, particularly in the USA. In 2007, insect-resistant Bt maize was grown on 21 per cent of the total maize cultivation area, and Bt maize with a combination of insect and herbicide resistance was grown on a further 28 per cent. Various Bt maize varieties are authorised in the EU as well. In 2007 there was notable cultivation of Bt maize primarily in Spain, where it was grown on around 75,000 hectares.

In recent years there has been increasing focus on another maize pest, the Western corn rootworm, that is spreading all the time – including in Europe. Bt maize which is resistant to the Western corn rootworm has been authorised in the USA since 2003 and has been grown on a large scale since then.

Bt not just for maize

However, maize is not the only plant into which Bt genes have been transferred. Genes for different toxin variants are transferred depending on the pests that a plant needs to be able to fend off:

  • European corn borer: Bt toxin cry 1Ab (cry=crystal protein)

  • Western corn rootworm: cry 3Bb1

  • Cotton bollworm: cry 1Ac

  • Colorado potato beetle: cry 3A

In 2006 18% of the genetically modified crops grown on 114 million hectares worldwide were insect-resistant Bt plants. A further 19% were a combination of herbicide- and insect-resistant crops. Herbicide resistance is the main GM trait, at 63%.

Distribution in the plant

Bt plants and varieties differ not just in terms of the particular strain of toxin they produce but also in terms of the amount of Bt toxin produced and its distribution in the plant.

The first commercially grown Bt maize plants contained high levels of Bt toxin in all plant parts - pollen, stems and maize cobs. They contained greater amounts of toxin than was strictly necessary to achieve the desired effect.

More recent Bt maize varieties not only produce smaller quantities of Bt toxin, they produce it only where it is needed. Today, Bt genes are provided with tissue-specific promoters , which activate toxin production only in specific plant parts. The Bt maize developed in recent years to combat the Western corn rootworm, for instance, produces Bt toxin primarily in the roots.

Bt maize: Effect on non-target organisms

Bt varieties – particularly maize and cotton – are now firmly established in some countries. But they still attract controversy.

IIn the USA a furore was created by a study which found evidence to suggest that pollen from Bt maize was harming the much loved monarch butterfly. The excitement has since abated. The study findings were based on laboratory trials which did not reflect natural conditions and were put into perspective by subsequent studies. Nevertheless, fears that the toxin could harm not just the target organism it is designed to combat, but also other living organisms in the maize field, are behind numerous safety research projects looking at the effect of Bt toxin on non-target organisms. No clear impacts that would indicate harmful effects have yet been found.

Current biosafety research projects are looking at the effects of Bt maize that is resistant to a maize pest that is new to Europe: the Western corn rootworm.

Development of resistance in the European corn borer and the Western corn rootworm

The fact that chewing insects can develop resistance to insecticides over time is nothing new. This has not occurred yet with classic Bt preparations, with the exception of a few isolated incidences. There are fears that large-scale cultivation of Bt plants will accelerate the development of resistance. This would devalue the effect of classic preparations, and organic farming would lose a vital method of plant protection.

In the USA the cultivation of Bt plants is accompanied by statutory resistance management. Proportionate refuge areas must be planted with conventional varieties without the Bt toxin.

On this issue too it has been shown that many fears were unfounded. The development of resistance to Bt toxin in the European corn borer appears to be much slower than was expected a few years ago.

A number of biosafety projects have looked at mechanisms for the development of resistance in the European corn borer and Western corn rootworm.

 

More from GMO Safety

 

Site Search

Full text search of all online content
personal memo
0document is at present noted on your personal memo.
Change font size
123

February 29, 2008 [jump to top]