Diese Seite auf Deutsch | Legal notice | About GMO Safety

Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)GMO Safety : Genetic engeneering - Environment - Plants

Field trials with GM wheat

Sophisticated approach for combating loose smut of wheat


The application has been filed: In Thulendorf (Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania) and in Üplingen (Saxony-Anhalt) there are plans for release trials with genetically modified wheat. The idea is to test a new concept for combating loose smut of wheat, a fungal disease. If it works, it would be possible to reduce the use of chemical crop protectants, and it would also be of particular benefit to small-scale farmers in developing countries.

The wheat was developed by a working group led by Christof Sautter at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich. Its aim was to use a biological principle that occurs in maize plants to increase the resistance of wheat to smut fungi such as loose smut (Ustilago tritici) and stinking smut (Tilletia caries). These plant parasites attack cereals and are spread via the seeds. They can be a particular problem in seed production.


Loose smut: Field with infected plants. This fungal infection is not a big problem in Europe. Worldwide, however, it causes harvest losses of 5 to 10 per cent.


Corn smut: The fungus uses a virus to ‘defend’ the maize plant it has infected against competitors.

(Photos: Bayer Crop Science)


Dr Christof Sautter, Institute for Plant Sciences of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich. His team succeeded in transferring the genes for the KP4 protein from the corn smut virus to wheat.

Loose smut: a clever parasite

Loose smut completes one lifecycle each year. To start with, infested plants are not outwardly detectable. It is only when they produce ears that a browny-black mass of spores becomes visible. The spores can be spread by wind and rain. When a plant is infected, the fungus penetrates the developing grain. If this is sown in the following growing season, the fungus grows with the germinating plant until it forms a new bunt ball in the ears.

To prevent fungal diseases, wheat seed is routinely treated. This kind of treatment with broad-spectrum chemical fungicides is not permitted in organic farming. There are control measures available here, but they are often very costly and effective only against specific fungal diseases.

Smut fungi are not a big problem in Europe, but they are in some developing countries. The small farmers there cannot afford to buy expensive seed every year, so they use part of their harvest to sow the following year. If this includes grain infected with smut fungi, the farmers are unwittingly contributing to a rapid spread of the fungal diseases and an accumulation in their own crops. Worldwide, according to estimates by the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre CIMMYT, smut fungi cause harvest losses of between five and ten per cent.

In principle it is possible to breed fungus-resistant varieties. But this is very time-consuming and depends on there being species available that are crossable and possess suitable resistance genes. This is not the case for all smut fungi.

The Zurich group tried a different approach. They transferred a natural protection method familiar from maize into wheat using genetic engineering methods. The effect is based on a special virus protein. It is produced by a virus that lives in corn smut fungi. The virus uses the protein to ‘help’ its host to protect itself against competition from other smut fungi within the maize plant – thereby preventing the maize plant from being attacked by other fungal infections. The idea was to transfer the genes for the viral defence protein (KP4) to wheat so that it can combat smut fungi in wheat and improve the crop’s resistance. The advantage of this approach is that the KP4 protein has a very specific effect against certain smut fungi, but not against other beneficial fungi that live on the plant or in its rhizosphere.

Field test under realistic conditions

Initial tests in the greenhouse showed that the concept works and can lessen fungal infections. As far back as 1999, Sautter applied to the Swiss authorities to test the developed GM wheat under field conditions. There followed years of bitter discussions, protests, complaints and, eventually, approval for a small-scale trial under extremely strict conditions: the individual plots were covered by weather-proof pollen protection tents and the soil was removed after the end of the trial and sterilised at 120 degrees centigrade. Only eight square metres were planted with the GM wheat.

Now a similar experiment is to be repeated in Thulendorf and Üplingen. The growth of the fungus and the resistance behaviour of the wheat plants are to be observed under natural environmental conditions. This was only partially possible in the small-scale trial conducted in Switzerland in 2004.

The trial design has a number of plots, each with five variants: two GM wheat lines that produce the KP4 protein, the two isogenic control lines (without the KP4 gene) and a conventional wheat variety that is less susceptible to smut fungus infections. For all five wheat lines, both untreated seed and seed that has been infected with loose smut will be sown.

The project will investigate not only the behaviour of the different wheat lines when infected with smut fungi, but also the effect that the KP4 protein contained in the GM wheat lines has on other fungi – both pathogenic and beneficial ones. The root area of wheat plants is home to a number of fungi that improve the plants’ nutrient uptake. First and foremost the project aims to obtain findings about the way the new resistance concept works. There are no plans to commercialise the KP4 wheat used in the trials.

Within the trial area on each site, GM wheat is to be sown on an area measuring no more than 72 square metres. A protective fence is to be erected to prevent larger animals and rodents from entering. Before the wheat plants emerge and after flowering, the trial field will be covered by a net to keep off birds. A minimum separation distance of 50 metres from the next wheat field is provided for. Outcrossing is unlikely, since wheat is a self-pollinator and fertilises itself within the flowers using its own pollen.

An application for approval of the release trial has been submitted to the relevant authority, the Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL). However, a decision is not likely before the planned sowing date at the beginning of April. If the KP4 wheat is sown later in the year, the growing season is likely to be dryer. No meaningful results on fungal infestation and the resistance behaviour of the wheat can be obtained under such circumstances.

The three-year trial series will now start in 2009.

More from GMO Safety

 

Site Search

Full text search of all online content
personal memo
0document is at present noted on your personal memo.
Change font size
123
Stinking wheat smut

April 9, 2008 [jump to top]