Diese Seite auf Deutsch | Legal notice | About GMO Safety

Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)GMO Safety : Genetic engeneering - Environment - Plants

BMELV coexistence research programme 2008

Locations, trial design, research questions and results


How can the cultivation of genetically modified and conventional maize in close proximity be organised to ensure that GMO traces remain below the 0.9% EU threshold? This is the question being investigated by the research programme on ensuring coexistence initiated by Germany’s Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (BMELV) in 2005.

The studies carried out as part of this research programme are being coordinated and conducted by scientists at the Julius Kühn Institute (formerly BAZ, BBA and FAL). In the first trial year, two field arrangements were set up and three test systems were trialled. In 2006 the focus was on realistic cultivation trials at six locations. In 2007 the previous year's trials were repeated using an almost identical trial set-up; the results are currently being evaluated. The trial programme is still ongoing.

Research aim

The aim of the research programme is to develop measures which will enable the compatible coexistence of conventional, organic and genetically modified maize cultivation. The trials focus on actual outcrossing rates; pollen drift studies are not being undertaken. The scientific findings will be used by BMELV to establish rules for good farming practice for the cultivation of genetically modified maize varieties in the context of the Genetic Engineering Act.


Aerial photograph of the trial set-up for determining minimum separation distances. Gross Lüsewitz, September 2007.

Photo: H. Pienz.


Diagram of the trial set-up for determining minimum separation distances (distances tested: 51, 78, 102 m), marginal effects and outcrossing rates in field plots. The Bt test system is used with Bt maize as the pollen donor and the isogenic hybrid as the pollen recipient. (Hauptwindrichtung=
prevailing wind; Klee/Gras=clover/grass)


Aerial photograph of the trial set-up for determining the effect of the crop species planted between the maize plots; top clover/grass mix, bottom barley stubble. Dahnsdorf, August 2007. Photo: Dr. Bernd Hommel.


Diagram of trial set-up to determine the effect of drill direction (Drillrichtung) on the outcrossing rate. Colour marker test system used with yellow maize (Gelbmais) as pollen donor and white maize (Weißmais) as pollen recipient.


Diagram of trial set-up to determine the effect of the GM maize field width on the outcrossing rate in the recipient maize field. Bt test system used with Bt maize as pollen donor and the isogenic hybrid as pollen recipient. SG: summer barley as intermediate crop between Bt maize and isogenic hybrid.


Diagram of the trial set-up used since 2008 to determine the effect of a 9 and 18 metre wide planting cordon (Mantelsaat) at the edge of the GM field. Bt test system used with Bt maize as pollen donor and the isogenic hybrid as pollen recipient. KG: clover/grass mix as intermediate crop between Bt maize and isogenic hybrid. (Hanf-Trennstreifen=hemp strip)

Research methods

Location and design of the trial fields:

The 2008 trials are taking place at six locations (Braunschweig, Dahnsdorf, Forchheim, Gross-Lüsewitz, Mariensee, Sickte). Mariensee is the main site. Two trial field designs have been set up at several locations according to a standard pattern. This will ensure that findings from individual locations are comparable and can be jointly evaluated.

Test systems: Two test systems are being used to determine the outcrossing rate. When developing measures which will be translated into good agricultural practice (e.g. separation distance), Bt maize will be used in principal as the pollen source (donor). Outcrossing to test fields with the isogenic variety (recipient) will be determined by genetic analyses. In parallel with this, coloured maize will be used as a GMO-free test system: individual yellow kernels appearing on the otherwise white maize cobs will provide a visual indication of outcrossing. Although this test system is cheaper, the results are not exactly comparable with current maize varieties due to the particular flowering features of the white maize variety. For this reason, it is only used when accompanied by comparative studies (e.g. the effect of different crop species planted between GM maize fields and conventional maize fields).

Sampling: Generally, twenty maize cobs are taken as samples from each of several points across the field and in some cases whole plants growing immediately beside the cob sampling points are also collected. This enables a comparison between silo and grain maize. All samples from the trial fields which use Bt maize as a test system are examined by an external laboratory.

Influencing factors: All the trial fields are equipped with weather stations which are operated by the German weather service and regularly evaluated. Wind direction, wind speed, temperature, air humidity, precipitation and sunshine are recorded on site during the flowering period. The outcrossing trials are conducted under worst-case conditions, i.e. the fields are arranged in the direction of the prevailing wind and varietal pairs (Bt maize and isogenic hybrid) with virtually synchronised flowering times are used.

Research questions and findings 2005 – 2007

In 2005 the trial designs and test systems were tested and evaluated for their suitability for coexistence studies. On the basis of these findings, further realistic field trials took place in 2006 and 2007.

Outcrossing distance: On the basis of literature studies, the minimum separation distance required to comply with the EU labelling threshold was originally set at 50 metres in 2003. In 2005 and 2006 various distances around this value were tested (24, 51, 78 metres). The trials, some of which were conducted when there was a constant prevailing wind, showed that significantly higher outcrossing rates than the threshold value can occur in the margins of the conventional neighbouring field even at a distance of 78 metres. However, outcrossing rates throughout the field at this distance were well below 0.9 percent.

In 2007 the distances were increased to 51, 78 and 102 metres and the results from these trials are currently being analysed.

Margin effects, in other words higher outcrossing rates at the field margin, also occurred over large distances in the outcrossing trials (2005, 2006). A single outcrossing was even found in the first field margin rows at a distance of 234 metres, although none were detected in the middle of the field.

In 2007 the 150 metre separation distance, which is now statutory, was tested for the first time. Here too there were margin effects, but outcrossing rates were very low and significantly below the EU labelling threshold across the field as a whole.

Intermediate crop: In 2005 a low-growing clover/grass mix was compared with tall sunflowers to investigate what affect the crop species planted between the maize fields had on the incrossing rate. It was found that sunflowers do not provide an effective physical barrier against pollen drift. The findings from this study have now been published in Crop Science, Vol.48, January-February 2008.

In 2006 the clover/grass mix was compared with cereal stubble. Because of their cultivation frequency, cereal crops are often grown between maize plots. Reliable results from this study are not yet available.

Drill direction: If the rows of maize are planted at right angles to the wind direction, the first rows can act as a barrier. If the maize rows are planted parallel to the wind direction, pollen could be expected to be carried further into the crop. In 2006 it was not possible to evaluate the trial investigating the impact of drill direction due to a heavy maize smut infestation. Preliminary results from 2007 indicate that drill direction could be significant. However, the data must be confirmed by findings from the following years before meaningful statements can be made. The trial will be repeated in 2008 at two locations.

Grain maize versus silo maize: Preliminary studies in 2006 indicated that the GM ratio in silo maize is lower than that in grain maize, as expected. Since the whole plant is used in silo maize, the GM ratio, which comes only from the kernels, is ‘diluted’.

Donor field width: The impact of the size of the GM maize field on the outcrossing rate has been investigated since 2007 as part of the research programme. Outcrossing from a 75 metre and a 150 metre wide donor field to a 75 metre wide recipient field is being examined. The results from the first trial year must be verified in the subsequent trial years.

Trials planned for 2008

Trials at the six sites will continue in 2008 to corroborate the previous results and evaluate further measures such as the effects of a planting cordon or field position on outcrossing to maize. In addition, the statutory minimum separation distance of 150 metres will be further tested.

Field position: Whether fields are arranged parallel to one another or longitudinally also affects the outcrossing rate. This will be examined for the first time in 2008 in an experimental approach.

Cordon: Tests will be carried out to see whether and to what extent the minimum distance can be reduced by planting a cordon at the edge of the GM maize fields. A cordon or buffer strip of conventional maize will be planted right next to the Bt maize field where it faces the conventional crop. In practice, farmers would harvest the cordon along with the GM maize and treat it as GM maize. This year the research programme will examine the effects of a 9 and 18 metre wide cordon (corresponding to 12 and 24 rows of maize). The effect of the cordon on outcrossing will be quantified in the coming years.

More from GMO Safety

 

Site Search

Full text search of all online content
personal memo
0document is at present noted on your personal memo.
Change font size
123

April 23, 2008 [jump to top]